BEPS has been singed by Hong Kong

BEPS & Automatic Tax Exchange of Information

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) has developed a raft of action plans in order to counter Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”). According to OECD, BEPS refers to tax planning strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to make profits “disappear” for tax purposes or to shift profits to locations where there is little or no real activity but the taxes are low, resulting in little or no overall corporate tax being paid.

This was necessary due to the technology advance and globalisation that have facilitated the ease of cross-border transactions, which contributed to a substantial increase in related party transactions between associated enterprises.  Whilst this may be economically beneficial, it may also create opportunities for aggressive international tax planning by artificially shifting profits to locations where they are subject to non-taxation or reduced taxation.

The G20 endorsed a package of measures proposed by the OECD to tackle BEPS in November 2015. The BEPS Package consists of the following 15 action plans:-

  1. Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy
  2. Neutralising the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Agreements
  3. Strengthening Controlled Foreign Company Rules
  4. Limiting Base Erosion via Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments
  5. Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account Transparency and Substance
  6. Preventing Tax Treaty Abuse
  7. Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status
  8. Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes in Respect of Intangibles in Line with Value Creations
  9. Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes in Respect of Risks and Capital in Line with Value Creations
  10. Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes in Respect of Other High-Risk Transactions in Line with Value Creations
  11. Establishing Methodologies to Collect and Analyse Data on BEPS and the Actions to Address it
  12. Requiring Taxpayers to Disclose Their Aggressive Tax Planning Strategies
  13. Re-examining Transfer Pricing Documentation and developing rules on transfer pricing documentation.
  14. Making Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective
  15. Developing a Multilateral Instrument to enable jurisdictions to quickly and consistently amend bilateral tax treaties in line with certain BEPS recommendations.

Courter BEPS Actions Taken by Hong Kong

Hong Kong has joined the inclusive framework for the global implementation of the BEPS action plans. Hong Kong has committed to the comprehensive BEPS Package, with the priority on the four minimum standards in the areas of harmful tax practices, tax treaty abuse, country-by-country reporting requirements and improvements in cross-border tax dispute resolution. Summarised below are the relevant counter BEPS actions taken by Hong Kong.

Implementing Automatic Exchange of Financial Information (“AEOI”)

The legislative framework for the automatic exchange of financial information implementation in Hong Kong have been enacted into the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Ordinance (“IRO”) in June 2016. Under the AEOI legislations, financial institutions are required to identify financial accounts held by tax residents of reportable jurisdictions or held by passive non-financial entities whose controlling persons are tax residents of reportable jurisdictions in accordance with due diligence procedures. Required information of these accounts (including name, tax identification number, account balance, amount of passive income etc.) has to be collected and furnished to the Inland Revenue Department (“IRD”) annually. The IRD will conduct AEOI with reportable jurisdictions provided that an arrangement is in place with the reportable jurisdiction concerned for the basis for exchange. Currently, the number of Hong Kong’s reportable jurisdictions is 126. The first exchange of information took place in 2018 in respect of the financial account information for 2017.

Introducing Transfer Pricing (“TP”) Legislations

Hong Kong introduced the transfer pricing legislation in July 2018, which codifies the transfer pricing principles into the IRO. The TP legislation requires Hong Kong entities to adopt the arm’s length principal and prepare compulsory TP documentation, if certain thresholds are met. The TP documentation requirement is consistent with global standard of three-tiered TP documentation, which consists of:-

  • Master file – it gives a high-level overview of the group of enterprises, including the global business operations and transfer pricing policies;
  • Local file – it provides detailed transactional transfer pricing information specific to the enterprise in each jurisdiction, including details of material controlled transactions undertaken by the enterprise and associated enterprises involved, amounts involved in those transactions and transfer pricing analysis with respect to those transactions.; and
  • Country-by-country report – it provides certain information relating to the MNE group’s income and taxes, together with certain indicators of the location of economic activity within the MNE group.

In addition, the TP legislations also gives a statutory basis to the cross-border dispute resolution mechanism (i.e. mutual agreement procedure and arbitration) and advance pricing arrangement, which were previously implemented based on IRD’s administrative rules.

Countering Treaty Abuse

The IRD has changed its practices in issuing certificate of tax resident for claiming tax treaty benefits in 2015 and adopted a much more stringent approach in processing such applications. The CoR application form has been changed significantly and as such, taxpayers are required to produce substantive amount of information regarding their place of management and control, place of business, establishments, personnel, business substance, etc. when applying for the CoR. The IRD indicated that they may refuse to issue a CoR where it is clear that the person would not be entitled to the tax treaty benefits as it is important for the IRD to uphold the terms and purpose of Hong Kong’s double tax agreements (“DTA”).

In addition, Hong Kong would adopt the following positions for the purpose of countering BEPS when entering DTA with other jurisdictions:-

  • Including the following preamble text in the DTAs “Intending to eliminate double taxation with respect to the taxes covered by this agreement without creating opportunities for non-taxation or reduced taxation through tax evasion or avoidance (including through treaty-shopping arrangements aimed at obtaining reliefs provided in this agreement for the indirect benefit of residents of third jurisdictions)”
  • Adopting the Principal Purpose Test provision whereby a treaty benefit shall not be granted in respect of an item of income or capital if it is reasonable to conclude, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, that obtaining that benefit was one of the principal purposes of any arrangement or transaction that resulted directly or indirectly in that benefit, unless it is established that granting that benefit in these circumstances would be in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions of the DTA.

Countering Harmful Tax Practice

In order not to create any harmful tax practices, Hong Kong has reviewed its preferential tax regimes (e.g. the corporate treasury centre, professional reinsurance, captive insurance and offshore funds regimes) and enacted legislative amendments to remove the ring-fencing features (i.e. by extending the tax concession from non-domestic transactions to domestic transactions) and introducing substantial activities requirements.

BEPS Consequences

The OECD is currently working on a new proposal to further address BEPS, which is also commonly known as “BEPS 2.0”.  BEPS 2.0 has two components, namely Pillar One which seeks to develop new taxing rights for profits derived from automated digital services (“ADS”) and large consumer facing businesses (“CFB”); and Pillar Two (also refer to as Global Anti-Base Erosion “GloBE”) gives the parent and source jurisdictions a right to tax income which are subject to no or very low taxation.

On 1 July 2021, the OECD / G20 Inclusive Framework issued the “Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy”, and 130 of the 139 member jurisdictions agreed on key components of the BEPS 2.0 project. The OECD aims at finalising the technical details by October this year and implementing the package in 2023.

Pillar One

ADS and CFB are the two group of business that are considered by the OECD as having the ability to participate actively and in a sustained manner within the economic life of a market country, with or without local physical presence. ADS refer to services that are both automated (i.e. the provision of the services to a particular user requires minimal human involvement) and digital (i.e. services to be provided over the Internet or an electronic network).

CFB is defined as those businesses that generate revenue from the sale of goods and services of a type commonly sold to consumers, including those selling indirectly through intermediaries and by way of franchising or licensing.

Pillar One initiative will apply to large MNE groups with global turnover above EUR 20 billion and profitability above 10% by way of distributing the taxing rights in respect of a certain portion of the profits of these enterprises to the market jurisdictions.

Pillar Two

There are four rules proposed under Pillar Two in the GloBE initiative which are as follows:-

  1. Income Inclusion Rule (“IIR”) that would tax the income of a foreign branch or a controlled entity if that income was subject to tax at an effective rate that is below a minimum rate.
  2. Undertaxed Payments Rule (“UTPR”) that would operate by way of a denial of a deduction or imposition of source-based taxation (including withholding tax) for a payment to a related party if that payment was not subject to tax at or above a minimum rate.
  3. Switch-over Rule (“SOR”) to be introduced into tax treaties that would permit a residence jurisdiction to switch from an exemption to a credit method where profits attributable to a permanent establishment (“PE”) or derived from immovable property (which is not part of the PE) are subject to an effective rate below the minimum rate.
  4. Subject to Tax Rule (“STTR”) that would complement the UTPR by subjecting a payment to withholding tax or other taxes at source and adjusting eligibility for treaty benefits on certain items of income where the payment is not subject to tax at a minimum rate.

The GloBE rules will apply to MNEs with revenue of more than EUR 750 million for the immediately preceding fiscal year. However, countries are free to apply the IIR to MNEs headquartered in their country even if they do not meet the threshold. The minimum tax rate used for purposes of the IIR and UTPR will be at least 15%.

On the other hand, the minimum rate for the STTR will be from 7.5% to 9%. Countries that apply nominal corporate income tax rates below the STTR minimum rate to interest, royalties and other types of payments will be agreeing with implementing the STTR into their tax treaties when they are requested to do so. The taxing right will be limited to the difference between the minimum rate and the tax rate on the payment.

Hong Kong’s Response

Despite that Hong Kong’s headline profits tax rates are 16.5% for corporates and 15% for unincorporated business, the GloBE proposal would likely have a significant impact to Hong Kong’s offshore regime, various preferential tax regimes and the capital gains exemption as the effective tax rates resulting from these regimes/exemption would likely be below the minimum rate.

To formulate response measures, the Hong Kong Government set up an Advisory Panel back in June 2020 to review the possible impact of the BEPS 2.0 package on the competitiveness of the business environment of Hong Kong, and to make recommendations on the response measures. The Financial Secretary presented in the 2021-22 Budget in February this year the direction of the Government’s response measures, indicating that Hong Kong would actively implement the BEPS 2.0 package according to international consensus while striving to maintain the key advantages of Hong Kong’s tax regime in terms of simplicity, certainty and fairness; minimise the compliance burden on the affected enterprises; and continue to improve the business environment and competitiveness of Hong Kong.

The Advisory Panel on BEPS 2.0 will submit a report to the Government after the OECD finalises the technical details of the BEPS 2.0 package. The Hong Kong Government will then study the recommendations in the report and consult stakeholders on the specific response measures, with a view to rolling out the relevant legislative exercise. As such, it remains to be seen whether certain carve-outs will be available under the final rules and the actual impact to the competitiveness of Hong Kong’s tax system.

    Ready to Get Started?